As England took the second new ball on the fourth day of the second 2009 Ashes test, Andrew Strauss called, unusually, for a team huddle, and close-ups revealed an authoritative facade poorly masking a captain's anxiety. We were reminded of that gorgeous Sunday morning at Edgbaston four years ago; the now-forgotten panic on Michael Vaughan's face as he turned with resigned desperation to Steve Harmison; the nauseating immediacy of submission and defeat as victory seemed to be slipping through England's disbelieving grasp. Having chosen not to enforce the follow on and then declaring in the face of his natural caution, Strauss was aware that the momentum of this series could have spun like a wrong 'un for the third time in two tests. It was possible - it is only a matter of time before a team will chase 500 to win a test, and why not Australia, in an Ashes test, at Lord's? In the face of all rationality, the game seemed in the balance overnight.
In fact, Australia didn't get close to winning this one and hindsight tells us that we knew an unlikely win would have gone entirely in the face of cricket history. Instead, we saw a performance of menace and authority from Andrew Flintoff to mark him out as the most un-English of sporting heroes, a man so aware of his own destiny that he seemed to shape an entire venue, and maybe in time an entire summer, around himself. He complemented the relentless hostility of Sunday's effort with a 10-over spell on day five that was beyond magnificent; no loosener, hardly a ball misplaced. He celebrated his three wickets as though he expected them, arms wide, down on one knee, like an adored father welcoming his children. Figuratively, literally, Flintoff was colossal.
The Worm does not apologise for his use of hyperbole: Flintoff's spell really was that good. But it would be disingenuous to say that he won the game single handed. Swann's deft and varied flight was of great importance on the last day; Anderson got movement in both innings and was a lead contributor in the result-defining innings, Australia's woefully substandard 215. Strauss' controlled 161 set the tone, while Prior, Cook and Onions made telling contributions too. Only Bopara and Broad will feel a need to prove themselves at Edgbaston and the former will be particularly glad for a victory which should guarantee an unchanged side if injuries permit. Bopara looks nervous, a trait unacceptable in a number three who should be the steadiest bat in the line-up. Ian Bell's good county form continues and he will patiently wait for his latest chance. His careful shot-play could be well suited to this Australian attack.
Now the Australians must regroup. They seem fragile, relying on a few mentors to keep the younger players positive. Just as Flintoff is the English talisman, galvanising those around him with his class and his history, Ponting means so much to this team. As the sole link to the truly great heritage of the last twenty years, if he is lost early the team loses conviction. Clarke and Haddin restored some confidence but in truth Australia's batting was frail, erratic and careless, in stark contrast to the first test. Hughes and Hussey need big scores. Centuries in Cardiff are going to be forgotten if Katich carries on giving his wicket away and North labours with increasing desperation to get off the mark. One must not read too much into one poor match - five of the top seven now have centuries in the series and like England last week Australia should resist the temptation to rush into changes. But therein lies the rub - Australia have precious few options in backup. There are simply no top-order batsmen to come in; North was promoted from reserve after the sacking of Andrew Symonds last month. The next reserve is Shane Watson, a one-day player and utility man who averages 19.7 with the bat in his 8 tests. Regardless of form, the top five are effectively undroppable.
Brett Lee comes into the side when fit, but for whom? Not Hilfenhaus, who deserves enormous credit for standing up to be counted when those around him are losing their heads. Hauritz has looked competent and dropping him would create an ill-advised imbalance. We are left with one of two, and this week The Worm finds himself defending an Australian under fire, at least to a point. Mitchell Johnson has quality - he has proven this with 102 wickets in 23 tests including star turns against South Africa. But in this series he has been dreadful, his captain has lost confidence in him and this has spread through the team. With every heavy sigh and skywards glace that Ponting makes, the junior members of the team wilt. And yet Johnson has 8 wickets in the series; good players take wickets when bowling badly. If he gets his radar right on this tour, he spearheads the attack. On form you drop him, but on potential it's Siddle who may stand down. Much may depend on how Johnson bowls at Northants this week.
Meanwhile, the standard of umpiring in this series needs to improve. Australia were on the wrong side of many unfortunate decisions, and although Ponting dismissed these as irrelevant in the post-match interview, The Worm is not so sure. Ponting himself in the first innings, Hughes, Katich and Hussey in the second. Could they have put on 115 between them to win the game? On this occasion the luck has not evened itself out - so far this series it has been all one way.
We are not watching the two best teams in the world but we are watching the premier series in test cricket. This second test had everything and while the absolute quality is not as consistently high as four years ago, there are fragments of the very best the sport has to offer. Given the context, Michael Clarke's 136 is the stand-out innings of the series to date. But this match will be remembered for Flintoff. He is an old-style hero and he'll be retired before we know it. It is time to savour his swansong, pray his fitness lasts fifteen more days and thank the fates of sport that he was born a Pom.
TNI ranking
ATHLETICS
CRICKET
CYCLING
FOOTBALL
FORMULA 1
GOLF
RUGBY
SNOOKER

Recent Comments